Cricinfo West Indies



Cricinfo Quiz

home


Slogout Game

Fantasy

Video

Cricinfo 3D

Betting

Shop

Help and Feedback



West Indies


News

Features

Photos

Fixtures

Domestic Competitions

Stanford 2020

Domestic History

Players/Officials

Grounds

Records

Daily Newsletter




 





Live Scorecards
Fixtures | Results
3D Animation






England v South Africa
Sri Lanka v India
County Cricket
ICC Intercontinental Cup

Current and Future Tours



News
Photos | Wallpapers




Cricinfo Magazine








Match/series archive
Records
Statsguru
Players/Officials
Grounds



Women's Cricket
ICC
Rankings/Ratings




Wisden Almanack



Games
Fantasy Cricket
Slogout



Daily Newsletter
Desktop Alerts
Toolbar
Widgets







The Marlon Samuels saga

Samuels' ban harsh, says Richie Richardson

Cricinfo staff

May 17, 2008


Richie Richardson: "This law seems to be made by somebody in an office somewhere who wants to be in control" © Getty Images
 

Former West Indies captain Richie Richardson has criticised the ICC for banning Marlon Samuels for two years and wants the relevant law to be amended. Samuels was found guilty of breaching the ICC's Code of Conduct for "receiving money, or benefit or other reward that could bring him or the game of cricket into disrepute."

The violation, which occurred during West Indies' tour of India in early 2007, carries a minimum two-year ban which came into effect on May 9. Richardson was part of the West Indies Cricket Board's (WICB) disciplinary committee that recommended a suspended sentence on account of Samuels' good behaviour.

"We aren't the ones who banned Marlon for two years," Richardson told Caribbean Media Corporation. "We wouldn't have done that and we will be issuing a statement to indicate that law needs to be revised because it is unfair."

The committee said they had also written to WICB president Julian Hunte "expressing concern about the propriety of prescribing mandatory minimum punishments" for the nature of Samuels' offence.

"I'm very disappointed I'm involved. I wish I wasn't because it is unfair. This law seems to be made by somebody in an office somewhere who wants to be in control.

"I can understand the problem we are having in the game with match-fixing and all of that. I can understand that they want to be severe. If somebody willingly and deliberately based on information, gives out [information] to a bookie or anything like that I can understand that ban.

"But Marlon naively befriended this guy or this guy befriended him and I haven't seen anything to prove that Marlon either deliberately gave out information or deliberately received funds from anyone."

Acting ICC president Dave Richardson had earlier justified the ban saying, "minimum penalties were agreed by the ICC Board, including all Full Members, and they reflect the seriousness of the issues at hand."

Add to del.icio.us | digg this | Stumble It What's this?

Live scores, results, news, features and more - a click away
Download the Cricinfo Toolbar
Current Cricinfo fantasy games - SL v Ind, Eng v SA & County Cricket
Login and check the standings
Live scores, ball-by-ball commentary & news direct to your phone
Cricinfo's mobile services
Cricinfo home Print this page Email this page to a friend Feedback



Related Links



Stories

Players/Umpires

Teams






Cricinfo Products
The Cricinfo Quiz - Sri Lanka v India special
Test your knowledge
Current fantasy - SL v Ind, Eng v SA & County
Check the standings
Play Slogout - our cricket action simulation game
Two formats to choose from
Add a scores widget now (new Cricinfo apps)
News/photos also available

Sponsored Links
Face-to-face wealth management advice
St. James's Place
Cars at Auto Trader!
The world of cars made easy
Win tickets to England v South Africa, 3rd Test
With Cockspur Rum
Bob Woolmer's Art and Science of Cricket book
Pre-order at Cricshop



 
Top 5 player searches
Most read stories