![]() |
Comments on this story Comments have now been closed for this article
Posted by Noman_Yousuf_Dandore on May 27 2008, 03:22 AM GMT Ian you know when I saw the title of your article, I knew it would be one of now many to polish warne. And honestly I was surprised when I didn't find his name in the beginning; but when I reached the latter half, there you were, doing it again. Mate don't you have anything else in the world to do? Or does he pay you half of his IPL paycheck to write this. You both have stooped so low that you don't regard the great Steve Waugh as one of the best players because he surpassed Shane Warne in the captaincy ladder. And don't give me the point about his captaicy at IPL, showing emotions on the field has got nothing to do with captaincy. It was disgusting to see him react when Bowden turned his appeal down. Cheers!! Posted by Patelbhai on May 26 2008, 21:35 PM GMT Great article by Ian Chappel. In the new world of cricket it is performance that counts. some players like Dravid do not have the temparament for ODI and T20. they should focus on tests. Mental attitude is a very important part of ODI and T20. Posted by Brainbird on May 26 2008, 15:25 PM GMT Brilliant article. You could have included McGrath and Pollock too. Posted by Sricket on May 26 2008, 11:55 AM GMT As usual Ian's comments are stimulating. However, there's one small point I would like to raise. Jayasuriya and Kaluwitharne didn't hit the headlines as an explosive opening pair during the 1996 World Cup - Kalu aggregated only 73 runs in 6 innings (ave.12.1) and during these innings his opening partnerships - with Jayasuriya - a mere aggregated 166 runs (ave. 27). Hardly earth-shaking performances. Kalu hit the headlines in the 1995-96 Benson & Hedges tri-nation tournament (the other teams were West Indies & Australia)when he won three match awards and was named the outstanding player of the preliminary rounds. Posted by jamrith on May 26 2008, 10:43 AM GMT Agree with all the comments, and let us not forget foot-in-the-mouth Uthappa whose fielding has been far slower than his mouth. Posted by Kooja on May 25 2008, 20:08 PM GMT Yeah, Ian is right. Age is no barrier for the blazing blades of Sanath and Gilly while the pigeon and Shaun (Pollock) are the other two blokes along with the irrepressible Shane (Warne) who have ignited a few old memories with their stellar performances. Perhaps Martin should sing, '"The old grey mare, she ain't what she used to be, but she can sure do it'. Posted by sarthak_will_win on May 25 2008, 19:12 PM GMT As Tendulkar himself said "ITS NOT ABOUT AGE BUT TALENT". All the oldies have proven it to be right. actually T20 is not all about talent. its also about your style of batting and of course how well one can adjust. so, as ian chappel says and everyone might have acknowledged do not care how old are you as long as you can hit the ball (or take wickets). Posted by mcheckley on May 25 2008, 18:33 PM GMT Speculation that Warne might leave retirement for the 2009 Ashes "if Ricky asked me" centers - terrifyingly - on entirely the wrong aspect; "is he good enough?" He IS but that is the least important parameter. "Ricky" is under contract to Cricket Australia, as captain. He has a voice in who plays, but he doesn't pick the team unilaterally and he assuredly does not set selection policy at the strategic level. If Warne wishes to be considered he has a clear route, and it is the same as for everyone else. He can rescind his retirement, play for Victoria, and advise the selectors that he is available. The damage to the morale of Australian cricket of allowing Warne to walk back into the Test arena without qualifying through the proper channels is immeasurable The dreadful thing is that it could happen due to the lust for short term financial gain. Interest and attendance would be sharpened. I wonder what pressure the sponsors are bringing to bear, even now? Next ? Lara ? Posted by SexyDT on May 25 2008, 17:59 PM GMT i wonder if T20 cricket was an option when most agressive batsmen of yesteryear were comeing close to calling it a day, guys like Sir Viv would'v been as succesful. Most probably, yes i'd think. A 35-38 year old athlete would't lose his stength immediately but would lose the stamina required to keep at it for 5 days of test cricket. So for us to see McGrath bowl 4 overs of his best and see Sanath & Co knowing they can use their brilliance for a short span without worrying about seeing through a session til Tea, we get to prolong our love affair with viewing their talents just a little while longer than we would have before this T20 era! We truly are blessed :) Posted by fataquie on May 25 2008, 17:07 PM GMT Good article Ian..but I can't comprehend the fact that you have left out McGrath from the old horses who have done exceptionally well in IPL. You have given example of Warne in the bowling department and captaincy but for me its really watching McGrath bowl like he's always bowled....exceptional!!
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||
|